Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen Zur Homepage der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen
Zur Homepage der Universität Erlangen

Eingang zum Volltext in OPUS


Hinweis zum Urheberrecht

Aufsatz zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:29-opus-37059
URL: http://www.opus.ub.uni-erlangen.de/opus/volltexte/2012/3705/


Implementation of Anaphylaxis Management Guidelines: A Register-Based Study

Grabenhenrich, Linus ; Hompes, Stephanie ; Gough, Hannah ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Scherer, Kathrin ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Treudler, Regina ; Mahler, Vera ; Hawranek, Thomas ; Nemat, Katja ; Koehli, Alice ; Keil, Thomas ; Worm, Margitta

Originalveröffentlichung: (2012) PLoS ONE 7.5 (2012): 29.10.2012 <http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035778>
pdf-Format:
Dokument 1.pdf (307 KB)


SWD-Schlagwörter: -
Collection: Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg / Open Access Artikel ohne Förderung / 2012
Fakultät: Medizinische Fakultät
DDC-Sachgruppe: Medizin
Dokumentart: Aufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Erstellungsjahr: 2012
Publikationsdatum: 30.10.2012
Kurzfassung in Englisch: Background
Anaphylaxis management guidelines recommend the use of intramuscular adrenaline in severe reactions, complemented by antihistamines and corticoids; secondary prevention includes allergen avoidance and provision of self-applicable first aid drugs. Gaps between recommendations and their implementation have been reported, but only in confined settings. Hence, we analysed nation-wide data on the management of anaphylaxis, evaluating the implementation of guidelines.

Methods
Within the anaphylaxis registry, allergy referral centres across Germany, Austria and Switzerland provided data on severe anaphylaxis cases. Based on patient records, details on reaction circumstances, diagnostic workup and treatment were collected via online questionnaire. Report of anaphylaxis through emergency physicians allowed for validation of registry data.

Results
2114 severe anaphylaxis patients from 58 centres were included. 8% received adrenaline intravenously, 4% intramuscularly; 50% antihistamines, and 51% corticoids. Validation data indicated moderate underreporting of first aid drugs in the Registry. 20% received specific instructions at the time of the reaction; 81% were provided with prophylactic first aid drugs at any time.

Conclusion
There is a distinct discrepancy between current anaphylaxis management guidelines and their implementation. To improve patient care, a revised approach for medical education and training on the management of severe anaphylaxis is warranted.


Home | Suchen | Veröffentlichen
 Sie benötigen weitere Informationen? Fragen Sie uns!


Letzte Änderung: 01.11.10